Welcome To Our Blog!

The Air Capital Comedy blog was created to support the comedy community in the Wichita Metro area and the rest of the comedy world. If you have any jokes, ideas, comments, critiques or would like to submit a written piece please contact us at aircapitalcomedy@yahoo.com and we will publish it unedited. Brevity is the soul of wit but longer essays are always welcomed!

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Louis C.K. and the Rise of the 'Laptop Loners'
by Adam Wilson from the Los Angeles Review Of Books

September 25th, 2012 reset - +
LOUIS C.K. EMERGES from the subway station: sullen, sweating. His balding crown of carrot colored hair is slightly brighter than his ruddy, freckled skin. The man is overweight but solid, like a fullback long past glory, in love with French fries, who still hits the gym. He’s got broad shoulders, thick arms, A-cup man breasts, and a sizable gut that hangs over his beltline. His black t-shirt is half a size too small, constricting his movements, and adding to the general impression of physical discomfort.
C.K. makes it up the subway steps and arrives at street level, exhaling as if he’s crested some unprecedented summit. He marches into a pizza joint, scarfs most of a giant slice in three bites, then disgusted, throws what remains in the garbage. To watch him eat is akin to watching a junkie shoot heroin; one can trace the convergence of shame and sublimity. All the while there’s music playing, the syncopated up beat of seventies funk. The singer repeats: “Louie, Louie, you’re gonna die.” The camera cuts to another set of stairs, this time a declension, C.K. hustling down to a door marked “Comedy Cellar.” The juxtaposition is stark: here lies humor, at the intersection of pathos and indigestion. We must armor ourselves with laughter.
So begins each episode of Louie, C.K.’s brainchild, currently in its third season on the cable channel FX. Cicero said that to be a philosopher is to learn how to die. Flaubert thought an artist must have a religion of despair. Accordingly, C.K. may be television’s true first in both categories.
If all this sounds too morbid and unsettling for primetime, well, it is. Louie, which airs on Thursdays at 10:30 p.m., represents a new epoch in cable programming. It’s been decades since The Cosby Show cast its wide net, tugging families from kitchens to living rooms for inclusive doses of post-dinner entertainment. In the 1990s, demographic fragmentation became a byproduct of both the growing ubiquity of cable, and a sharp rise in the number of TV sets per household. The kids could watch TGIF in the basement while mom and dad caught the late movie in the living room and, upstairs, grandpa let the History Channel wash over him in a wave of World War II nostalgia.
These days it’s different. The young — and the young at heart — bundle into beds, laptops and tablets propped inches from faces. They are snug in these cocoons, sequestered from all stimuli but those they source from screen and headphones. People watch alone now or in pairs, at odd hours, either streamed, downloaded, or on DVD, sometimes months or years after the shows have originally aired. Low budget shows on small market basic cable channels like FX don’t have to be populist, because they don’t have to pull in big advertisers in order to survive. These shows make money through licensing contracts with companies like Netflix and Hulu, through DVD sales, and through digital download sales via iTunes and Amazon.
The last few years have witnessed the emergence of exciting original content from small market cable channels. AMC gave us Mad Men and Breaking Bad; TBS tried (and failed) to bring Conan O’Brien to basic cable; and TNT had a breakout hit with The Closer. FX, too, has had its share of successful shows, including the multi-award winning courtroom procedural, Damages, and the critically acclaimed Rescue Me.
But even among its peers, Louie is an outlier. It is a show that, more than any other, both caters to this new kind of audience — the Laptop Loners — and has, as its creator, a member of the club. C.K. doesn’t just star in Louie, he also writes every episode, directs, produces, and oversees the music. Until recently, he even edited the show on his personal laptop. What’s more, C.K. is his own subject, a single father whose particular brand of post-millennial loneliness feels of a piece with Louie’s auteur production style and the solitudinous way in which we currently watch television.
If the 1980s was the Me generation — marked by consumerism and an obsession with personal needs (Give me hair gel! Give me cocaine!) — then we are living in the iGeneration, in which the self is projected back toward the world via social media. But whereas many Americans weave their public personas from curated chains of cultural signifiers — think of the popular web platform tumblr, where users “express themselves” by posting digital reproductions of existing images — C.K. aims for something more penetrating, a filmic representation of his own psyche. Louie is fascinatingly insular; it reads like a direct transmission, a strange and lovely Athena, birthed whole from the head of a brilliant, balding Zeus.
C.K. was born Louis Szekely (pronounced See-Kay), to a half-Hungarian, half-Mexican father, and an Irish-American mother. He spent his childhood in Mexico — Spanish is his first language — before moving to the Massachusetts suburbs with his mom when he was seven. After high school, he tried standup, doing open mikes at night while working days as an auto mechanic. There’s evidence on YouTube: a skinny young guy with full-bodied hair and the slightly bro-ish trace of a Boston accent. He moved to New York in his twenties, doing standup while writing for Late Night with Conan O’Brien, The Dana Carvey Show, and The Chris Rock Show. He wrote and directed the feature film, Pootie Tang, a gonzo satire of black exploitation movies that grew out of a Chris Rock sketch. Roger Ebert described it as, “like one of those lab experiments where the room smells like swamp gas and all the mice are dead.”
C.K. hit a comedic stride when he had kids. He cut a lot of schtick from his standup act — zany impressions, oddball conceptual humor — in favor of discussing his quotidian existence, waxing on subjects as diverse as the agonies and ecstasies of Cinnabun, and what it means to “suck a bag of dicks.” Audiences connected. An HBO special, Shameless, cultivated a growing and fanatical fan base, and eventually led C.K. to his own HBO series.
Lucky Louie detailed the late stages of a failing marriage that echoed the decline of C.K.’s own. HBO canceled it after a single season, and a real-life divorce followed shortly after. C.K. had such a bad experience working with HBO on Lucky Louie that he almost didn’t ink the FX deal. He held out for full creative control, which he got in exchange for a miniscule budget and an off-season, off-hours time slot. Before the start of season three, FX offered C.K. a bigger budget and asked him to move up to the nine p.m. slot. C.K. refused, citing added pressure from primetime advertisers that he felt would compromise the show’s autonomy.
Louie is based on C.K.’s life as a divorced father of two, and a standup comedian whose career success can’t counterbalance the glib state of his personal life or the rebellions of his rapidly middle-aging body. Louie the character’s biographical cloth is woven from the same torn rags of C.K. the standup: Catholic school education, ex-wife, backlog of bungled relationships, and the charge of two young daughters. The fictional scrim is thin.
And yet, for all its adherence to autobiographical detail, Louie bears little resemblance to reality TV. C.K. neither attempts to present life as it actually is or to woo viewers with an upgraded, escapist approximation of it. Louie’s New York can be both mimetic — the apartments are all appropriately small — and utterly fantastical: a severed head rolls down the street; a doctor tells you you’re too out of shape to exercise; Matthew Broderick directs an all-Jewish remake of the Godfather. It’s the New York of C.K.’s imagination, the city inside his brain. Like Joyce’s Dublin, it’s sign-posted with recognizable locations, but sense-warped by its auteur’s myopic subjectivity. And like a Bergman dream space, or the literal limitlessness of cyberspace, C.K.’s nebulous New York is in a state of constant flux, blessed by FX with the freedom to be inconsistent even with itself.
Every show has its own internal logic, a set of self-imposed rules that govern format and pacing — imagine a Law and Order episode that doesn’t begin with the discovery of the body — but also things like register, tone, and cinematic style. Louie’s goal is contrarian — the show’s self-imposed rules accommodate an in internal logic that changes from episode to episode, sometimes from scene to scene. C.K. wants to deconstruct the sitcom, to defamiliarize viewers in a way that is exciting, but this can also be alienating when it doesn’t work. For starters, Louie is without regular characters, save for Louie and his two daughters. A woman named Pamela (played brilliantly by Pamela Adlon) — Louie’s friend and unrequited love — appears in some, but not all episodes. Louie has a brother in the first season, but a sister in the second. Two different actresses have played Louie’s mother. In season three, an African-American actress who bears no resemblance to the white girls who play her daughters plays Louie’s ex-wife. This may be a case of colorblind casting, but more likely it’s another example of Louie’s interest in the uncanny and inexplicable. On an airplane, Louie receives a glass of water the size of a thimble. While under anesthetic, Louie wakes from a hallucination about Osama bin Laden to find he is being mouth-raped by his dentist. These are exaggerated realities, representations of how the real world sometimes feels, not how it looks.
The fact that Louie gets away with this defiant looseness is a testament to C.K.’s rare ability to articulate the confounding illogic of his own headspace in a way that is, for the most part, entertaining. But there’s also a cultural imperative at work. Sitcoms, historically, have upheld old-fashioned ideas about the American family. Even a show like Full House — in which three men raised a set of young daughters — reinforced the status quo while pretending to explode it. Full House was about a new kind of family doing its best to imitate the old kind. Louie, on the other hand, is a single father living in a culture where the rules, roles, and expectations aren’t clearly laid out or established. To build a truly new model, one must burn what came before; this applies to families and sitcoms alike.
You can see a similar restlessness in the range of C.K.’s influences. Some episodes ape Fellini or Allen, while others have traces of Lynch or Truffaut or web series’ like Funny Or Die. Indie film pioneer John Cassavettes may be another tutelary spirit. Like Cassavettes, C.K. shuns cinematic convention, and has no hesitation in biting the hand of the Hollywood machine that feeds him — C.K. recently pissed off all sorts of people in suits by releasing his latest standup film as a five dollar download on his website, and by selling tickets to his current comedy tour on his personal website rather than through Ticketmaster. And as in Cassevettes’s best films like A Woman Under the Influence and Husbands, Louie can somehow move fluidly between docu-realism and heightened surrealism without sacrificing continuity.
Overall, Louie feels less like a TV series than a gathering of tangentially related short films, each unlike the others in style and tone, but linked by a consistent worldview — a sort of jovial sadness — and a consistent effort to derail our expectations as viewers. The thematic obsessions — death, child rearing, and masturbation — don’t change, and what carries is their creator’s constant, futile grappling with the same unanswerable questions: What do we do when our bodies betray us? How do we raise children in this soul-mined America? Can you bring lube on an airplane? He attacks these questions from a variety of angles, hammering at them with force and renewable vigor.
Interestingly, Lucky Louie took on much of the same thematic material as Louie has, but with an almost diametrically oppositional methodology. Lucky Louie was meant to be a throwback, an old-style sitcom shot in front of a live studio audience, in the vein of The Honeymooners and All in the Family. The idea was to work within the conventions of the genre, and for the genre’s technical constraints to trigger innovation. Lucky Louie would redefine the sitcom by following its rules. At least, this was HBO’s marketing spiel, an impossible promise on which C.K. never had a chance to make do.
The format of the American sitcom held steady for almost 40 years. The most noteworthy innovation was a negation; in the early nineties, HBO comedies like the short-lived Dream On ditched the pervasive canned laugh track, paving the way for the so-called cringe comedy of shows like Curb Your Enthusiasm. On Curb, the absence of a laugh track makes it difficult for viewers to know when to laugh. We cringe because we’re holding in laughter, waiting for a cue that it’s okay to release. But there is always a breaking point, an explosion into an absurdity so deep — Larry rushing into the water to “save” a baptismal candidate from drowning, for example — that the tension is relieved, and the laughter is released.
Louie both reacts to the failure of Lucky Louie and advances on Curb’s cringe comedy by creating something tenser, more tonally ambiguous. Louie’s singularity lies in its ability to further confound viewers by setting up jokes, and then providing pathos instead of punch lines. Not only does Louie’s audience not know when to laugh, they don’t even know if what they’re watching is supposed to be funny. For the Laptop Loner, this ambiguity is made all the more palpable by the absence of viewing partners; we use other people’s reactions to gauge the correctness of our own. But it also makes the ambiguity less assaulting. Alone, we can be comfortable in our discomfort.
Take “Bully,” from season one, in which a group of high school jocks wreak havoc on Louie’s blind date. The lead bully threatens to rough up our hero unless he makes a “sincere” request for amnesty. Louie reluctantly complies. The trained TV viewer anticipates what surely must come next: Louie’s date will appreciate his maturity; she’ll be impressed by his pacifism.
Not so. “You’re a great guy,” she says. “But my chemistry is telling me that you’re a loser.” Is this funny or just depressing?
One can imagine how this scene would play out on Curb. Larry, dismayed, would hold his date in his trademark, squint-eyed stare. He would be indignant to be so unfairly judged. In Curb, what often allows the audience to laugh is the reassuring knowledge that, despite Larry’s humiliations, he’s still Larry David: superior, smug, self-satisfied. Larry doesn’t feel shame, only annoyance and self-righteousness. He’ll laugh last while drinking champagne in his mansion.
Louie gives no such reassurance. One gets the sense that humiliations stay with him, that he carries them like blooming tumors in the pockets of his swollen belly. Both Louie and Larry are bourgeois white American men, but only Larry’s feel like first world problems. In part, this is because bodily despair transcends race and class. Louie’s misery seems inevitable, irreparable, real in the sense that it extends beyond the boundaries of the show’s fictional sphere and into C.K’s actual life. We surmise that it’s not just the character that’s overweight and out of breath, but also the actor who plays him.
The waning state of C.K.’s fleshly self is a major source for Louie’s particular amalgamation of humor and woe. Louie’s doctor tells him he has “the worst penis I’ve ever seen.” A young woman wants him to describe — mid-coitus — his body’s degeneration. Again, we’re privy to C.K.’s subjective reality, his glass half empty interpretations. It’s the nightmarish solipsism of he who thinks the world was built to hurt him, the literalization of a misanthrope’s imagination. A real doctor would never say that, but he’s probably thinking it. With a woman half your age, one might imagine her eyes on you, scrupulously assessing.
Short clips from C.K.’s standup are intercut with these vignettes: C.K. describing his life as a “48 hour cycle of diarrhea,” or the way he “rain[s] sweat” on women during sex, or the woman who committed suicide two years after performing oral sex on him because “that’s the gestation period of suicidal shame that comes from having had my penis in your mouth.” The current season opened with a monologue on needing reading glasses in order to masturbate. If you can stomach the scatology, you’ll see that these jokes are meant to make you laugh, but more so to open a candid investigation into corporeality; into what it’s like to live in a body that disobeys, decays, and will one day cease to exist.
For comedians, a healthy dose of fatalism is a job requirement. In one of his funniest standup routines, C.K. complains that even the most ideal life will end in the deaths of you and those you love. But Louie’s fatalism is balanced out by an occasional idealism that’s almost shocking in its earnestness. Louie isn’t jaded. When he asks the annoying stoner who lives across the hall to “just be a neighbor, a human being,” it feels as if he’s addressing the world writ large, that basic human decency is something he believes in. We get the sense that he actually cares about other people.
Despite the humiliations, or perhaps in spite of them, there’s an admirable dignity in the way that Louie lumbers through life: dragging his own heft, but always pushing on; with caustic wit and cautious love; with an eye for small moments of beauty. The latter isn’t a euphemism for lame sentimentality. It’s not the kind of show where a father hugs his daughter as an indie crooner sings over acoustic guitar. C.K. knows better than to play his daughters for redemptive sympathy. He is at once too cynical, too sincere, and too weird for schmaltz.
One episode begins with a Felliniesque vignette in which we see Louie close to tears as he watches a tuxedoed violinist perform on a subway platform. As the music reaches its crescendo, a vagrant arrives and proceeds to strip down and bathe with a bottle of water. New York’s omnipresent filth and uncanny beauty coalesce. By the end of the scene the bather scrubs in rhythm with the violin; it all feels oddly joyous. As in the films of Cassavetes, Louie is interested in the intersection of suffering and catharsis, the way extreme emotions mirror one another. As Joni Mitchell pointed out a long time ago, laughing and crying, you know it’s the same release.
Later in “Bully,” Louie follows the bully to his parents’ house in Staten Island. Louie rings the bell and confronts the bully’s father. In lieu of a punch line, there’s an actual punch: the father smacks his son. Louie is appalled. He mentions the cyclical nature of violence, only to be called a faggot by the bully’s mother and thrown out of the house. It doesn’t end there. The father steps outside and apologizes to Louie. That’s the way he’s learned to parent even though he knows it’s wrong. They both light cigarettes and smoke in silence. It’s a scene from a Raymond Carver story, a moment of queasy grace.
An overwhelming sense of loneliness pervades Louie. There’s sometimes hard-won camaraderie — with other parents, other comedians — but no one quite manages to connect. When they do, the connections are fleeting; by the next episode Louie’s new friends are gone and he’s returned to the awful state of his unchecked subjectivity.
In a hilarious but strangely heartbreaking season three episode, Louie makes a new male friend on a trip to Miami. The friend — a lifeguard — is of the Baywatch variety: tan and muscly, cheekbones to die for. Neither Louie nor lifeguard can quite determine the other’s intentions, or even his own. Are they gay for each other, or what? When the subject comes up, the conversation gets so vague and awkward — neither man will say the word “gay” — that the friendship has no choice but to dissolve. The scene illustrates the dilemma of the new American man, confused about current social codes and the appropriate attitude toward one’s own masculinity.
But Louie’s loneliness also stems from being a single father, one whose fears are left to flourish without a wife to share and tame them. Just as the Laptop Loner is confounded by the absence of laugh cues, the single father has no barometer for his behavior as a parent. Louie is a loving father, one who clearly means it when he says he reserves all his wishes for his kids, and who is shattered when his daughter tells him she loves momma more than daddy. It is through this lens of unconditional love that one begins to understand his most charged and difficult material.
There’s a controversial routine from C.K.’s standup — excerpted during season two of Louie — in which he explains that the problem with a society that condemns child molestation is that, because of the strength of our recoil, child molesters are more likely to murder their victims after raping them. “I can’t help thinking that if we take down a few notches the hatred for [child molesters] […] at least you’d get the kid back. Guy could call you, ‘Hey I just fucked your kid. Do you want me to bring him to soccer or drop him at your house?’”
It’s an impossible observation to unpack, made more so by how sickening it sounds when spoken out loud. But it works because its core is one of deep parental concern. C.K.’s not an apologist for molestation, but a father working out his midnight dread. What he’s taking on is the irrational logic of parenting, the valuation of your child’s life above all else, including, paradoxically, your child’s safety. “I have two children. My biggest fear is that they will disappear.” C.K. explains. “Why do kids disappear? Because people have sex with them and then toss them.” A married man wouldn’t make this joke; his wife would neither let him tell it or believe it.
Louie’s post-modernity, it’s worth noting, has been rejected once already. The sixties and seventies saw the mainstream popularity of authors like John Barth and Thomas Pynchon, and filmmakers like Bergman and Lynch, who shattered established notions of character and reality in the same way that C.K. has. Later, Lynch’s Twin Peaks upended all our expectations as to what a TV drama could be. But the trend didn’t continue, and the backlash was tidal. Now we’ve got Jonathan Franzen and Aaron Sorkin on one side, and Suzanne Collins and Spiderman on the other. Realism is back in style, its popularity matched only by the equally traditionalist cult of sci-fi/fantasy. Perhaps, as in the 1930s, financial crisis demands either macho realism or extraplanetery allegory.
In this climate, television may have the most potential as a growing medium. Demographic fragmentation has insured the demolition of a targeted mainstream, and perhaps even our new way of watching — alone, quarantined by our screens — encourages the kind of departures from convention that Louie gets away with. When you’re not surrounded by family and friends, it’s easier to give yourself over to strangeness, to follow the associative narrative of unmediated consciousness. As anyone whose ever seen a planetarium’s Pink Floyd laser light show knows, the collective dream is a harder thing to achieve, especially without hallucinogens.
Louie, clearly, is not for everyone. But it’s C.K.’s fearless embrace of the unsettling, the complex, and the potentially unmarketable that makes it an exciting show to watch. Louie is an ever-evolving creation, a no bullshit attempt to make something honest and challenging in a medium that’s inherent nature stands in stark opposition to these very goals. This is a brave thing to do, braver even than broadcasting one’s deep-seated fears and self-loathing for laughs. In one standup routine, C.K. claims that he has, “only the courage for a perfect life” — a life without adversity. It’s a rare moment of dishonesty from television’s most honest man.
¤
Recommended Reads:

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Working a Crowd Is Part of the Act 



Ten minutes after Mitt Romney finished his speech at the Republican National Convention last week Judah Friedlander walked onstage at the Comedy Cellar in Manhattan and got to work solving the world’s problems.  
Wearing baggy jeans and a baseball cap with a glittery American flag on the side, Mr. Friedlander announced matter-of-factly that he would solve any political challenge yelled out by the audience. Homelessness? Simple: Put everyone living on the street in tollbooths, a solution that he says makes sense because the homeless have experience asking for change. Drug crisis? Mr. Friedlander said he supports legalization, but he would start with heroin, because that would make legalizing marijuana easier.
Mr. Friedlander, whose chunky glasses and shaggy hair bring to mind the nerdiest pimp from the 1970s, is best known for playing the comedy writer Frank Rossitano on the NBC sitcom “30 Rock,” which begins its final season next month. But in his terrifically entertaining stand-up, which he has performed since 1989, he adopts a more flamboyant, overtly invented character whose brashness makes Donald Trump sound like Michael Cera.
It’s a marvelously committed performance. Unlike Stephen Colbert’s know-it-all blowhard on “The Colbert Report,” Mr. Friedlander doesn’t preen or ramp up the bombast. His slacker posture and shrugging demeanor suggest he’s a more deluded, even likable, fool than a hypocrite. These days he comes off as a bipartisan satire of egotistic leaders who never seem to have known doubt. And his stated ambition makes presidential candidates look modest. Witness the nickname of his stand-up persona, announced on his oversize yellow T-shirt: World Champion.
Some of the most boisterous comedy audiences I’ve witnessed in this city have been at Mr. Friedlander’s shows. In an age when much stand-up comedy can seem like a meticulous accounting of personal anxieties and observations, Mr. Friedlander delivers jokes in character. He doesn’t gaze at his navel so much as wax poetic about it. What also distinguishes him is how he integrates crowd work. This comedy jargon refers to the interplay comedians have with the audience. It might begin by asking a couple in the front row where they are from, or quizzing them on their relationship.
Good crowd work is typically a nimble, formulaic dance with the audience that segues into a prepared set. Mr. Friedlander, however, weaves it throughout his entire act and even organizes his carefully wrought jokes around interactive conceits. I’ve seen him onstage about half a dozen times (he performs constantly in New York), and while he dips into the same pool of jokes, the order and rhythm change at every performance. He pulls off the magic trick that every great stand-up must master: He fools an audience into thinking a joke he’s told countless times is new.
Early in an hourlong show at Caroline’s last month he asked a man in the front row where he was from. “New Paltz” came the reply. “I’m from Old Paltz,” he responded with alacrity. “You copied everything from me.” He moved on to ask the crowd about the Olympics, turning a table of game Dartmouth students into a recurring target. When an audience member responds with a giggling fit or blathers on, the act meanders. And occasionally Mr. Friedlander’s off-the-cuff jokes fizzle. But that’s the risk of crowd work, the flip side of the excitement and spontaneity of its unpredictability.
To mitigate this inevitability, Mr. Friedlander appears to pay careful attention to frequency of jokes. If the crowd work gets laughs, he keeps it going for as long as possible. If it wanders, he responds with more punch lines. Without breaking character he aims for a balance between prepared and improvised material that results in something loose and spontaneous without veering into indulgence.
Typically he leans on two kinds of jokes to anchor his set. There’s the spectacular boast delivered with the urgency of small talk. “I had a dream I was sleeping with 10 hot chicks, and then I woke up and was sleeping with 20 even hotter chicks,” he said somberly. “It was the one nightmare I ever had.” And then there’s the finely sculptured and skewed gem in the tradition of Mitch Hedberg: “I saw a one-handed man in a secondhand shop and I told him, ‘I don’t think you’re going to find what you’re looking for,’ ” he said.
But the heart of his act is that request for problems to solve. As the bit develops, the audience throws out more obscure issues, and the show turns into something of a contest between the performer and crowd. Mr. Friedlander never wavers, deftly dodging questions, steering a conversation in a direction that plays to his strength. His inevitable triumph is the kind of fixed game that only a seasoned comedian could engineer.
For a superior boaster Mr. Friedlander has a surprisingly warm side. He insults, but gently, and sometimes even offers praise. Part of his success, I suspect, is that he makes audience members feel as if they are part of the act.
Mr. Friedlander’s aesthetic is a reminder of something that is often misunderstood: Live stand-up is its own form, as distinct from televised stand-up as a play is from its film adaptation. Crowd work is only the most obvious difference. Live comedy has an energy, tension and charisma that simply cannot be reproduced.
It’s unfortunate that so many are introduced to the form by late-night talk shows, since there’s a deadness and polish to those sets that fails to capture the charge of the best live comedy. Some well-shot projects however do an excellent job simulating it. (Spike Lee’s lively direction of “The Original Kings of Comedy” is a prime example.)
Some stand-up comics translate better than others to different media. Mr. Friedlander, who has not released a comedy album (although he has written a book in character called “How to Beat Up Anybody”), could probably make a winning television special or record, but it would not capture the essence of his work. In a time when jokes are downloaded, tweeted and podcast, he performs an act best suited for an intimate, packed room in which the joyous sound of a cackling crowd being won over becomes an integral part of the music of comedy.

Saturday, September 15, 2012

Hilarious And Very Creative!

Mugshots Of Celebrities If They Lived In The 1920s

Hilarious new Tumblr alert!! This one is called Mugshot Doppleganger and it mixes current celebrities' actual mugshots with mugshots from the 1920s. posted

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

We Will Miss You Bill!

Twin Cities comedian 'Wild' Bill Bauer dead at age 62

Twin Cities comic 'Wild' Bill Bauer, who died at 62, pictured with comic Louie Anderson. (Courtesy of Scott Hansen)
Louie Anderson called him the funniest guy he ever worked with. Alex Cole said he was the most giving Twin Cities comedian around. Scott Hansen said he was a champion of new comedians.
On Wednesday, Aug. 29, "Wild" Bill Bauer died in his sleep at his Inver Grove Heights home. A fixture of the Twin Cities comedy scene, Bauer was 62.
News of his death stunned members of the comedy community on Thursday, with many of them taking to Facebook and Twitter, sharing stories about the comedian.
Longtime friend and colleague Louie Anderson said this about Bauer in an email: "Today we lost one of the founding fathers of standup comedy in Minnesota. The funniest guy I ever worked with. He was funny, he was brave, and he was charitable. His name was Wild Bill Bauer. Some people earn their nicknames through a hat, a hitch or the way they talk. He earned his on stage. Today I lost a brother, a friend, and a fellow artist."
On Twitter, Bauer's son Patrick, who is also a comedian, wrote: "My dad @TaoOfPooka died last night. He'd stated that he was either to be partially cremated or taxidermied. He was awesome and I love him."
Bauer, a Vietnam vet and former paramedic, was one of the first comedians to perform standup comedy at the now legendary Mickey Finn's in Minneapolis back in the late '70s alongside Hansen, Anderson, Jeff Gerbino and Alex Cole.
Cole called Bauer his best friend and said watching him perform was a joy. He recalled the first time he saw Bauer do standup.
 
"At the time, I thought I was the only comic in Minneapolis," Cole said. "And then I saw the original guys -- I saw Bill Bauer. I thought he was really bizarre. I didn't think he'd make it as a comic, but when Mickey Finn's started going and you got to see Billy work, there were flashes of something. His sense of humor was so different from everyone else. While I was trying to do Bill Cosby, Bill Bauer was doing 'Wild' Bill Bauer.
"He used to say, 'People love me or hate me,' but it got to the point there was no hating anymore," Cole said. "Over the years, Billy continuingly got better. He was still twisting bits and seeing how they could be better. And he was always writing and still on the road."
Hansen said he got together just last week with Bauer for dinner. He got a call from Bauer's brother Thursday morning with the bad news.
"We were kids when we started out. None of us knew what we were doing," Hansen said. "It's amazing what we were able to do. We just started throwing stuff out there to see what would happen."
Recently, Bauer had been running the Big Laughs Comedy Club in New Hope and was still performing. He was scheduled to do a one-man show in November, Hansen said.
"He gave a lot of people a lot of chances to work," Hansen said. "He's definitely a person who championed new comedians."
Craig Allen, Bauer's partner at the Big Laughs Comedy Club, was shocked when he heard about Bauer's death. He said Bauer gave him lots of opportunities -- from collaborating on writing projects to operating a comedy club.
"He's a comedic force that we're not going to see for a while again," Allen said. "With somebody that loud and gregarious and full of energy, you don't expect them to go out that quietly."
Magician/comedian David Harris considered Bauer a close friend and mentor. Bauer invited Harris to open shows for him on tours and the two booked Running Aces Harness Park.
"I'll miss his generosity and support. He was a true mentor," Harris said. "I'll miss having someone to call and ask, 'What do you think of this joke?' or 'What do you think of this on the business end?' "
Over his three decades in the comedy world, Bauer made numerous appearances on the nationally syndicated radio "Bob and Tom Show" and also appeared on national television networks, including Comedy Central, Showtime, NBC and ABC. But he never became a household name.
"It's fair to say he didn't get the recognition on the national level he deserved," Harris said.
But what he did get was plenty of respect and gratitude from local comedians, including up-and-comer Jenn Schaal, who performed at Big Laughs Comedy Club just last week. She said she always appreciated his advice and the way he supported and mentored folks who were trying to break into the local comedy scene.
"He always gave us opportunities and then would critique what we did," Schaal said. "People don't have to be nice, but he always was."
Along with son, Patrick, Bauer is also survived by his wife, Cheryl.
 
Amy Carlson Gustafson can be reached at 651-228-5561. Follow her at twitter.com/amygustafson.
Copyright 2012 TwinCities. All rights reserved.

Monday, September 3, 2012

Via splitsider.com

How College Comedies Are Watched by All Ages of Dudes

"College is the best time of your life," is something people like to say and believe. It’s also something that self-perpetuates itself: you approach college with that special time of your life vigor and demand nothing less. Accordingly, it's the college comedy film's obligation to capture this ethos from all angles: those looking forward to college, those in college, and those looking back at college.
Animal House came out on DVD around the time I was applying for colleges. My dad swiftly purchased it for me with the advice of "you should watch this before you go to college." I am not unique in this; dads were buying their sons Animal House VHSs for years and will eventually buy them Animal House 3-D blu-rays for years to come. Animal House and other college comedy films can show you what college will be like or, at least, show you what everyone else will think college will be like. They also give you something to look forward to, to study for the SATs for. More specifically they seem to exist to answer one question: Will I get to see boobs in college? And the answer based on every single college comedy is a resounding "Yes!" There are more boobs in these movies than there are blackboards, which is reasonable since the vast majority of college comedies speak much more to the male collegiate ideal than the female. In these movies, women are objects either to be ogled at or won over by the charming protagonist (or if they're really lucky, they get to be just housewives who stay at home taking blowjob classes). It’s unfortunate; however, these pictures are geared towards the adolescent and the adolescent at heart, and that viewer wants to believe college is the time when they'll see the most boobs possible.

For those in college it's less about the aspiration of seeing the boobs, it's about how will they see boobs. To those inclined, these movies become instructional. Toga Parties date back to the 1950s but Animal House is credited for making them as an essential part of the college experience as sodium-based diets and too infrequently washed bed sheets. Where a disco party nowadays would be thrown with irony and intentional misrepresentation, kids continue to throw Toga Parties in earnest. Still, more than these explicit examples, these college comedies provide a guide to how college should feel. In these movies, college at its best is lived like there is a tomorrow and that tomorrow is going to be filled with not college and a job and drudgery. Vance "Van" Wilder, Jr. can't leave college because college is the only place where good things, college things can happen and he instructs others, namely Taj, how do follow suit. Similarly, it was Rodney Dangerfield's job in Back To School to teach his son the right way to be a college student, which mostly involves partying, talking back in class, and doing flippy dives into pools. Even Revenge of the Nerds doesn't aspire to offer an alternative vision of college but to assert that nerds too can have the same sort of drunken shenanigans as the muscular. For those in college, they can watch movies about college, regardless of how incredibly dated they are, and confirm they're doing it right.

Then that person graduates and that same movie reminds them that they did it right. The college comedy allows its post-college viewer to remember the time that was. Old School took this a step further and made the film about this nostalgia itself. Beyond its fratty set pieces, the film is about being able to relive the best time of your life. Sure, now they can afford to bring Snoop Dogg to a party but the result isn't so much different from when they were 20 and Doggystyle was playing over the boombox. This gets to the core of the revisionist history element to most college comedies. Partly, this is because every college comedy is written by someone who went to college and wanted to recreate their experience with a bit more pizazz and partly this is because college comedies can fill in some of the gaps in your partying memory. You might not have chugged a fifth of Jack but you totally know someone who did (so what if he was a fictional character). College comedies prey on the built-in feelings many have towards that time and they use that goodwill as a sort of workaround from having to ground the film emotionally. A generation's college comedy acts a supplement to a college photo album: "This is what my friends and I looked like and this movie shows how we felt and what we did and how often we saw girls' boobs."

And it all works because very generally college is the same for most viewers. There are tons of variables that can go into a college experience but it still is college, the time in your life when you are about 18-22 and live at a school surrounded by only people your age. The cut and dryness of the time period gives these movies an added bit of universality. Everyone has mid-20s and early-30s and etc. but it's pretty impossible to delineate them as completely. High school is similar to college in this way; however, because they characters are younger, it's a bit creepy to make them as lewd. College as a clear-cut time period becomes a thing; a thing teenagers can look forward to; a thing college students can inhabit; a thing parents could remember fondly to their kids. All college comedies draw from this and contribute to it. They are ways to experience THE "best time of your life" in perfect-90 minute bundles and see some boobs in the process.